Tuesday, August 4, 2015

How to Go Super Long or Short on Gold: UGLD, GLL & DGZ

We recently added the VelocityShares 3x Long Gold ETN (NYSEARCA: UGLD) to our SmallCap Network Elite Opportunity (SCN EO) portfolio not necessarily because we have turned into gold bugs while the ProShares UltraShort Gold ETF (NYSEARCA: GLL) and Deutsche Bank AG DB Gold Short ETN (NYSEARCA: DGZ) offer investors an easy way to make a bearish bet on gold without having to resort to dabbling directly in futures.

How To Go Super Long on Gold With UGLD

The VelocityShares 3x Long Gold ETN seeks to provide long exposure to three times (3x) the daily performance of the S&P GSCI Gold Index ER plus a daily accrual equal to the return that could be earned on a notional capital reinvestment at the three month US Treasury rate. More specifically, the ETN uses futures contracts to track the gold portion of the S&P GSCI Index which is tracks a world production-weighted basket of non-financial commodities.  

In other words and of you really really really are a gold bug, the VelocityShares 3x Long Gold ETN is the way to go. However, the ETN is also down 53.2% since the start of the year, down 48.5% over the past year and down 62.4% since February 2012.

Nevertheless, we added the VelocityShares 3x Long Gold ETN in the belief that gold is ripe for at least a dead cat bounce – especially if rates rise and/or the dollar falls again.

How to Short Gold the Easy Way GLL & DGZ

The ProShares UltraShort Gold ETF seeks daily investment results corresponding to two times the inverse (-2x) of the daily performance of gold bullion as measured by the US Dollar fixing price for delivery in London while the Deutsche Bank AG DB Gold Short ETN is based on a total return version of the Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index Optimum Yield Gold, which is intended to track the short performance of a single unfunded gold futures contract. This means that either GLL (if you want a leveraged investment with augmented returns or risk) or DGZ (if you don't want the extra risk associated with leverage).

The ProShares UltraShort Gold ETF is up 38.5% since the start of the year, up 23.1% over the past year and up 81% since September 2008 while the Deutsche Bank AG DB Gold Short ETN is up 19.4% since the start of the year, up 13.4% over the past year and down 43.8% over the past five years. Here are the latest technical charts for both the ProShares UltraShort Gold ETF and the Deutsche Bank AG DB Gold Short ETN:

Share Performance: UGLD vs. GLL & DGZ

Finally, here is a quick look at the performance of the VelocityShares 3x Long Gold ETN verses the ProShares UltraShort Gold ETF and the Deutsche Bank AG DB Gold Short ETN over the past two years or so:

As you can see, the gold bugs have been losers at least for this year. Nevertheless, there might be space in your portfolio for the VelocityShares 3x Long Gold ETN as well as the ProShares UltraShort Gold ETF and the Deutsche Bank AG DB Gold Short ETN depending on what your time horizon is for the direction of gold.

SmallCap Network Elite Opportunity (SCN EO) has an open position in UGLD. To find out what other open positions SCN EO currently has, and to learn why so many traders and investors are relying on this premium subscription service, click here to find out more.

Monday, June 29, 2015

Goldman Sachs Removes Extra Space Storage from Conviction Buy List; Lowers PT (EXR)

On Tuesday, Goldman Sachs announced that it has removed Extra Space Storage, Inc. (EXR) from its Conviction Buy List.

The firm has maintained a “Buy” rating on EXR, and has lowered the company’s price target from $51 to $50. This price target suggests a 12% upside from the stock’s current price of $43.94.

Analyst Andrew Rosivach commented: “We think the stock is inexpensive on forward 2018E AFFO, but the higher 2014E multiple may require the stock to consolidate.”

Extra Space Storage shares were down 21 cents, or 0.47%, during Tuesday morning trading. The stock is up 21% YTD.

Thursday, June 18, 2015

Down and Out in Memphis; Movin̢۪ On Up in Salt Lake City

Location, location, location, goes the old adage—usually indicating that the geography of the pricey real estate you are considering buying justifies its expense.

But a comprehensive new Harvard-Berkeley study suggests that location may be even more important to the poor if they are to have a crack at rising to the middle class or beyond.

To put it simply, geography is destiny when it comes to social mobility—more so at least than tax credits for the poor, heavy taxation of the rich, the presence of universities, affordability of tuition or proximity to extreme wealth.

The researchers found that proximity to middle-class areas in particular made intergenerational upward mobility likelier; a strong K-12 school system, higher test scores and lower dropout rates also helped; and, “some of the strongest predictors of upward mobility are correlates of social capital and family structure. For instance, high upward mobility areas tended to have higher fractions of religious individuals and fewer children raised by single parents,” the study found.

In its Monday edition, The New York Times assembled the researchers’ data to create an interactive map that shows where the poorest Americans have the greatest shot at upward mobility and where they remain most stratified.

Among large American cities, a child raised in the bottom fifth in family income had the greatest chance of rising to the top fifth in Salt Lake City (11.5%), Seattle (10.4%) and Pittsburgh (10.3%). Mobility was also present in some of America’s largest metropolises such as Boston (9.8%), New York (9.7%) and Los Angeles (9.6%).

Mobility opportunities were smallest in cities of the South and industrial Midwest such as Memphis (2.6%), Atlanta (4%), Charlotte, N.C. (4.3%), Indianapolis (4.8%), Detroit (5.1%) and Columbus, Ohio (5.1%).

Apart from major cities, some of the most radically upwardly mobile areas are seen in North Dakota, such as Williston (33.1%), center of that state’s shale boom. The most radically stratified non-urban areas are scattered through the Deep South and in remotest Alaska, such as Nome (2.2%).

Using the Times’ interactive data, one can see that a child who grows up in Chicago in the 10th percentile in family income ends up on average in the 34th percentile in income, lower than someone in Dallas (35th percentile), Los Angeles (40th) or Williston, N.D. (59th)—but a better average outcome than a child from Memphis (28th), Cincinnati (32nd) or Baltimore (33rd).

The researchers emphasize that their data are correlational rather than causal.

“What is clear from this research is that there is substantial variation in the United States in the prospects for escaping poverty. There are some areas in the U.S. where a child’s chances of success do not depend heavily on his or her parents’ income. Understanding the features of these areas—and how we can improve mobility in areas that currently have lower rates of mobility—is an important question for future research that we and other social scientists are exploring,” the researchers state.

---

Check out 10 Best Cities for Job Seekers on ThinkAdvisor.

Wednesday, June 17, 2015

Detroit Makes History. Now What?

Detroit has assumed its place in US history as the largest-ever municipal bankruptcy. Despite its massive size and the infamy of the event, the impact on the broad municipal market impact is expected to be negligible.

Detroit assumed its place in US history as the largest-ever municipal bankruptcy. Despite its size (Detroit estimates its liabilities at $18 billion) and the infamy of the event, the broad municipal market impact is expected to be negligible .

Sooner Than Expected, But Not Unexpected

Detroit's Chapter 9 filing on July 18, although sooner than expected, was in no way a surprise to the market. The filing came one month after emergency manager Kevyn Orr's June proposal to pay creditors pennies on the dollar in settlement of debt totaling $11.5 billion. Many viewed Mr. Orr's plan as a prelude to bankruptcy from the outset. For more detail, see our recent thoughts on this subject in "Distress in Detroit."

The proposal met with tough opposition from creditors (we had our own say on this matter) and legal action from pensioners also facing severe haircuts. In fact, a motion filed in state court the same day by a pension fund seeking a temporary restraining order to prevent the filing appears to be the catalyst for the sooner-than-expected event .

What Happens Next?

The city now has to convince a bankruptcy court that it is insolvent and eligible for Chapter 9 protection. Creditors will likely argue the city is not insolvent, pointing to current cash flow and assets owned (which are potential candidates for liquidation).

Bottom line: This is going to be a long and protracted battle, with court challenges along the way. The Chapter 9 filing is but the first chapter in what is sure to be a lengthy negotiation that could offer no clarity for years. It is likely to become a very expensive exercise for the already fiscally barren city .

For the broader municipal market, we do not anticipate a widespread systemic effect and investors shou! ld expect little market impact. The city's problems, while long known to the municipal market, have had little bearing on it – a scenario we expect will continue.

While some indirect action such as outflows or price weakness could ensue in the near-term as the market digests the news, we would remind investors that headlines rarely tell the whole story. The basic fundamental credit underpinnings of the municipal market remain very healthy and, in fact, better than they were in 2008.

Detroit Is the Exception, Not the Rule

For those fearing a Detroit repeat elsewhere in the US, we would submit – there is no reason to panic. Detroit's situation is unique, as indicated by the emergency manager's own assessment :

The city's population has declined 63% since its 1950 high and 26% since 2000.Unemployment peaked at a startling 23.4% in June 2010, up from 6.3% in 2000, and remained at an elevated 18.3% in June 2012.Detroit's violent crime rate is five times higher than the national average and the highest of any large city.Approximately 40% of the city's street lights are not functioning; 78,000 structures and 66,000 lots are abandoned and blighted. Arson is prevalent, with 12,000 fires each year, 60% in derelict or unoccupied buildings.Detroit's general fund deficit currently stands at $375 million, or roughly $700 million when adjusted for recent deficit borrowing. That's within the context of a $1 billion fiscal year (FY) 2014 budget. The city had projected negative cash flow of $198 million in FY 2014, and by the end of FY 2013, will have deferred $100 million in pension funding.Municipal bankruptcies are rare, but not unprecedented. And while the federal government has already indicated a reluctance to intervene, Michigan may step in to protect the creditworthiness of the state and its municipalities, and to ensure fair treatment of all interested parties. We hope it will take action to do so, following the example of other states before it (consider Rhode Isl! and in th! e case of Central Falls). In our view, the state's failure to act could cost Michigan and its municipalities much more in the long-term than Detroit saves today.

Peter Hayes, Managing Director, is head of BlackRock's Municipal Bonds Group and a member of the Americas Fixed Income Executive Team.

Sunday, June 14, 2015

Will "Black Sails" Help Starz Navigate TV's Choppy Waters?

First, Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX  ) decided it wanted to HBO. Now, Starz (NASDAQ: STRZA  ) wants a piece of the action with an original program called Black Sails, due to air next January.

Starz pulled out the stops at San Diego Comic-Con with a large booth populated by a replica pirate ship meant to give visitors a feel for the show. Starz treated fans to a screening Thursday night during the con with music performed by show composer Bear McCreary, whose other credits include the reimagined Battlestar Galactica and The Walking Dead.

The show, set 20 years before Robert Louis Stevenson's classic book Treasure Island, focuses on pirates who face enemies all about as they fight to preserve a criminal haven known as New Providence Island. Executives no doubt hope the series and its dark undercurrent proves appealing to the tens of millions who have taken to Game of Thrones and The Walking Dead.

There's merit to the plan. Offbeat and edgy original programming has proved to be an attractive alternative to network TV fare in recent years. Black Sails fits the mold.

Starz also needs the help. Revenue growth has gone missing as debt has ballooned since 2011. Meanwhile, Netflix's sweeping deal with Walt Disney means the network won't have access to Marvel, Star Wars, and other popular properties come 2016. Executives have until then to develop a cost-effective portfolio of originals and licensed programs capable of igniting growth.

Unfortunately, there's no guarantee that original programming will pay off. Look at Netflix. For as good a draw as House of Cards was, the new Arrested Development failed to draw even a million new members. Netflix shares sold off as a result, and that's in spite of a significant earnings beat.

So while I'd love to believe Black Sails will take TV's treasure island, as an investor, I'd rather add Starz to my watchlist. Here's how you can do the same.

Who will win the $2.2 trillion media war that's pitting cable companies against technology giants? The Motley Fool's shocking video presentation reveals the secret Steve Jobs took to his grave and explains why you need to be looking at these three power players that film your favorite shows. Click here to watch today!

Tuesday, June 9, 2015

Good News for Ford and GM in Europe

Ford (NYSE: F  ) and General Motors (NYSE: GM  ) have had a terrible time in Europe recently. Each lost nearly $2 billion in the region last year, and both are expected to lose big again in 2013. Turnaround plans are under way, but continued declines in Europe's new-car sales have raised doubts about their chances of success.

But some good news for a change: Sales were up slightly last month, amid signs that the situation is stabilizing. In this video, Fool contributor John Rosevear looks at the state of the European new-car market -- and at why the latest developments bode well for the bottom lines at both Ford and GM.

Improving conditions in Europe are just one of several good reasons to think that the Blue Oval still has big growth opportunities ahead. We've outlined those opportunities in detail, in the Fool's premium Ford research service. If you're looking for some freshly updated guidance to Ford's prospects in coming years, you've come to the right place -- click here to get started now.

Monday, June 8, 2015

Procter & Gamble Stock Tops the Dow

Up and down the markets go in a tumultuous week for stocks across the globe. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJINDICES: ^DJI  ) has recovered from deep losses today and nudged into the green, helped by Procter & Gamble's (NYSE: PG  ) big gains. The blue-chip index is up a meager five points as of 2:20 p.m. EDT after suffering nearly triple-digit losses this morning. Still, concerns over the future of quantitative easing continue to spread investor doubt, and most of the Dow's members are in the red. Let's check out what Procter & Gamble's doing to beat back the Dow's losses and why most stocks are falling again today.

P&G soars despite stimulus fears
Today's report of a 3.3% gain in durable-goods orders beat expectations and showed that manufacturers are still succeeding despite tax increases and budget cuts. That wasn't enough to fight off stimulus fears, however, after Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke's comments to a congressional committee indicated that the central bank could slow stimulus bond-buying later in the year. Easing will have to end eventually, but Wall Street doesn't see it that way yet. Bernanke did caution that slowing easing too soon could jeopardize the economy's recovery, however, so fear over the end of "QE infinity" looks premature.

Procter & Gamble hasn't given in to the pessimism, however: Its stock has gained 4% to lead the Dow higher. The company is bringing back former CEO A. G. Lafley when current chief executive Robert McDonald departs at the end of June. Lafley oversaw P&G's strong growth from 2000 to 2009, and his rehire has ignited investor optimism, which has dwindled over the company's lackluster past few years. McDonald has aimed to cut costs and increase market share during his time, but his efforts to steer P&G out of the depths of the recession haven't been enough for investors. Lafley has promised no major changes to P&G's strategy, but his hire has immediately created a spark.

Procter and Gamble is outnumbered on a Dow dominated by laggards, but no stock is losing so much as Hewlett-Packard (NYSE: HPQ  ) . Shares of the tech giant are down 2% today as part of a correction after yesterday's massive double-digit rise. Earnings beat expectations and sparked yesterday's surge, but investors shouldn't place too much faith in HP's turnaround just yet. The company might be topping Wall Street's projections through cost-cutting, but slumping PC sales still dominate HP's financial woes. Until HP can successfully transition away from PCs into more lucrative areas such as mobile and cloud computing, investors should expect more ups and downs from this troubled stock.

Verizon's (NYSE: VZ  ) stock also ranks among the biggest Dow laggards, with shares down 1.1% today. The telecom firm released its Verizon Cloud data backup system for iOS users yesterday after launching the app for Android users last month. The app is a part of Verizon's focus on cloud technologies as it looks to solidify its hold on mobile wireless users. The company's partnership with Nokia's Lumia 928 phone should help to attain that goal if the Windows phone takes off and secures a niche outside of Android and iOS platforms.

The massive wave of mobile computing has done much to unseat the major players in the PC market, including venerable technology names like Hewlett-Packard. However, HP is rapidly shifting its strategy under the leadership of CEO Meg Whitman. But does this make HP one of the least-appreciated turnaround stories on the market, or is this a minor detour on its road to irrelevance? The Motley Fool's technology analyst details exactly what investors need to know about HP in our new premium research report. Just click here now to get your copy today.

Bank of America Case Burns JPMorgan Chase

In the swirl of lawsuits facing the big banks over mortgage-backed securities, things can change seemingly on a daily basis. A recent example can be found in the sudden settlement between Bank of America (NYSE: BAC  ) and mortgage insurer MBIA (NYSE: MBI  ) , a squabble that had been brewing for some time, with no apparent end in sight.

Now, a suit AIG (NYSE: AIG  )  is pursuing against B of A has opened up a can of worms for peer JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM  ) , as the judge in the latter case has cited the former litigation as proof that he had no jurisdiction to throw out claims by Dexia that MBSes it bought from Bear Stearns, Washington Mutual, and, on its own and as purchaser of those two entities, JPMorgan.

Venue change makes all the difference
The change stems from the fact that a New York appeals court is allowing the larger AIG v. Bank of America suit to be heard in state, rather than federal court. In the Dexia case, the judge used the Edge Act, which makes a distinction between domestic and foreign banking activities, to throw out the bulk of Dexia's case against JPMorgan.

But AIG's tenacity in its mission to recoup some of its crisis-era losses has spurred the megainsurer to push its case concerning $10 billion of crummy MBSes against B of A, despite a supposed vow to the latter by the New York Fed that the bank would not be responsible for such claims.

The decision to move the AIG case to a state rather than a federal venue was a big win for the insurer, and a blow to B of A. Now this complaint is proving to be a problem for JPMorgan, too.

Just the beginning?
Though the Dexia v. JPMorgan lititgation involves a small number of disputed securities -- 65 in all -- with a relatively small overall value of $774 million, this case is obviously important. At the time of the original ruling, the decision was hailed as a boon to big banks, which would now be considered immune from similar lawsuits.

JPMorgan apparently saw the suit as significant, as well, or it would not have put such time and effort into fighting it; given its small size, it surely would have been much cheaper to settle. Unfortunately for the big banks, this litigation news looks like the well-worn road of toxic MBS lawsuits just got a lot longer.

With big finance firms still trading at deep discounts to their historic norms, investors everywhere are wondering if this is the new normal, or if finance stocks are a screaming buy today. The answer depends on the company, so to help figure out whether JPMorgan is a buy today, check out The Motley Fool's premium research report on the company. Click here now for instant access!

Thursday, June 4, 2015

Why the Street Should Love CareFusion's Earnings

Although business headlines still tout earnings numbers, many investors have moved past net earnings as a measure of a company's economic output. That's because earnings are very often less trustworthy than cash flow, since earnings are more open to manipulation based on dubious judgment calls.

Earnings' unreliability is one of the reasons Foolish investors often flip straight past the income statement to check the cash flow statement. In general, by taking a close look at the cash moving in and out of the business, you can better understand whether the last batch of earnings brought money into the company, or merely disguised a cash gusher with a pretty headline.

Calling all cash flows
When you are trying to buy the market's best stocks, it's worth checking up on your companies' free cash flow once a quarter or so, to see whether it bears any relationship to the net income in the headlines. That's what we do with this series. Today, we're checking in on CareFusion (NYSE: CFN  ) , whose recent revenue and earnings are plotted below.

Source: S&P Capital IQ. Data is current as of last fully reported fiscal quarter. Dollar values in millions. FCF = free cash flow. FY = fiscal year. TTM = trailing 12 months.

Over the past 12 months, CareFusion generated $628.0 million cash while it booked net income of $320.0 million. That means it turned 17.3% of its revenue into FCF. That sounds pretty impressive.

All cash is not equal
Unfortunately, the cash flow statement isn't immune from nonsense, either. That's why it pays to take a close look at the components of cash flow from operations, to make sure that the cash flows are of high quality. What does that mean? To me, it means they need to be real and replicable in the upcoming quarters, rather than being offset by continual cash outflows that don't appear on the income statement (such as major capital expenditures).

For instance, cash flow based on cash net income and adjustments for non-cash income-statement expenses (like depreciation) is generally favorable. An increase in cash flow based on stiffing your suppliers (by increasing accounts payable for the short term) or shortchanging Uncle Sam on taxes will come back to bite investors later. The same goes for decreasing accounts receivable; this is good to see, but it's ordinary in recessionary times, and you can only increase collections so much. Finally, adding stock-based compensation expense back to cash flows is questionable when a company hands out a lot of equity to employees and uses cash in later periods to buy back those shares.

So how does the cash flow at CareFusion look? Take a peek at the chart below, which flags questionable cash flow sources with a red bar.

Source: S&P Capital IQ. Data is current as of last fully reported fiscal quarter. Dollar values in millions. TTM = trailing 12 months.

When I say "questionable cash flow sources," I mean items such as changes in taxes payable, tax benefits from stock options, and asset sales, among others. That's not to say that companies booking these as sources of cash flow are weak, or are engaging in any sort of wrongdoing, or that everything that comes up questionable in my graph is automatically bad news. But whenever a company is getting more than, say, 10% of its cash from operations from these dubious sources, investors ought to make sure to refer to the filings and dig in.

With 24.8% of operating cash flow coming from questionable sources, CareFusion investors should take a closer look at the underlying numbers. Within the questionable cash flow figure plotted in the TTM period above, other operating activities (which can include deferred income taxes, pension charges, and other one-off items) provided the biggest boost, at 16.8% of cash flow from operations. Overall, the biggest drag on FCF came from capital expenditures, which consumed 12.9% of cash from operations.

A Foolish final thought
Most investors don't keep tabs on their companies' cash flow. I think that's a mistake. If you take the time to read past the headlines and crack a filing now and then, you're in a much better position to spot potential trouble early. Better yet, you'll improve your odds of finding the underappreciated home-run stocks that provide the market's best returns.

If you're interested in companies like CareFusion, you might want to check out the jaw-dropping technology that's about to put 100 million Chinese factory workers out on the street – and the 3 companies that control it. We'll tell you all about them in "The Future is Made in America." Click here for instant access to this free report.

We can help you keep tabs on your companies with My Watchlist, our free, personalized stock tracking service.

Add CareFusion to My Watchlist.

Wednesday, June 3, 2015

Getting Rich from Military Technology, Part I

leadimage

When you listen to military communications, a lot of words are slang, and actually have quite distinct meanings. For example, there was this time, long ago during my Navy days, when my squadron was working up out at NAS Fallon, Nevada. ("Working up" is Navy shorthand for getting everyone qualified to deploy.)

We were out on a bombing range, flying a racecourse pattern, taking turns rolling inbound on a practice stretch. We would line up, release our weapons one at a time and then get graded on bombing accuracy. Eventually, I made a radio call and said, "We're Winchester, bingo, RTB Fallon."

Huh? What did I say? Basically, I told the controller that we had dropped all our bombs, were out of ammunition ("Winchester"), were low on fuel ("bingo") and had to return to base ("RTB") at Fallon. The idea in Navy communications is that you want to keep it short and pack a lot of information into your calls.

The Vampire Call

Out on the front lines — out where the gray ships deploy — there are all manner of other coded words specific to the deployment area and any perceived threats. There's one call, however, that strikes fear into everyone's heart… the "vampire" alert.

A radio call of "Vampire, vampire" does NOT mean that there's a teenage movie about underage girls who fall in love with guys from Transylvania on the ship's TV system.

No, the "vampire" call means that there's a missile inbound, moving at high speed toward the aircraft carrier or its battle group. Somebody, somewhere has shot a missile at your floating home away from home. In the days of the Cold War, the battle-space problem was Soviet missiles.

Out in the Western Pacific, where I deployed, the Russians typically sent out swarms of gigantic Tu-95 Bear bombers, which carried missiles the size of small airliners.

032013_pss2

It used to threaten the fleet with long-range missiles.
Now, this Bear is a museum piece.
BWK Photo, Monino Air Museum, Moscow

Or sometimes, there were Soviet surface ships loaded with batteries of supersonic missiles designed to kill carriers. Or it could have been the formidable Oscar class of submarine, also stuffed with missiles that it could launch underwater.

One thing was for sure, however. If you were out flying around and saw a missile trail, you were supposed to hit the microphone key and shout, "Vampire!" The idea was to get everyone's attention at the speed of light. You wanted to get the tracking radars pulsing and quickly to find those killer pipes trailing fire.

What then? Our doctrine was that the battle group would react and, at first, attempt to jam the inbound "vampires" with electronic countermeasures, or spoof the rockets with chaff and flares. Or perhaps if that wasn't working, one or more of our destroyers or cruisers would fire missiles to shoot down the incoming bad guys.

As a last-ditch measure — when reaction times were down to fractions of a second — all of the Navy ships had one or more Phalanx Close-in Weapon Systems (CIWS), which are high-speed Gatling-type guns for putting a wall of shells in front of those enemy missiles. Whatever works, right?

As we went through our drills out on deployment, many were the times when we sat around the ready room discussing how to defend against those Soviet missiles. Wouldn't it have been nice to have something like those "phaser" systems, like in Star Trek? Dream on, right?

And what of today? Is there still a missile problem out there? Do battle group commanders and sailors up and down the line still worry about "vampire" calls? Well, in the past 22 years since the end of the Cold War, the missile threat has actually gotten worse, what with arms proliferation across the globe. We're still waiting for that Star Trek defense.

Hold that thought.

The Russian's "Missing Elements"

Speaking of the Russians, in 1869, Russian chemist Dmitri Mendeleev categorized all of the elements then known to science, based on atomic weight and other properties. He laid out the elements, lightest to heaviest on a table. In the process, Mendeleev noted several gaps. It appeared that some elements were just… missing.


032013_pss

Mendeleev's original table, with "missing" elements.

Changing the Nature of Computing and Warfare

Today, nearly 145 years later, one of Mendeleev's "missing elements" holds the key to a technological revolution, a profitable technological revolution.

This element — long since discovered — forms the foundation to a recent breakthrough that will revolutionize the world of digital computing, and even change the nature of weaponry and war.

We're literally on the ground floor here. This tech is so new that it's scarcely out of the lab. Indeed, the only samples of this new tech come from specially built bench-model systems. But that's about to change, because, as you likely know from cellphones and flat-screen televisions, great new tech ideas seldom remain hidden in the shadows for long.

This new tech breakthrough will create vast new fortunes, upturn entire industries (and create new ones, too) and give sleepless nights to corporate strategists and military planners across the world. What is it?

Find out tomorrow in Part II of this story…

Best,
Byron King

Tuesday, June 2, 2015

Helicopter Jon to the Rescue as S&P 500 Gains Most in Four Weeks

It’s a bird! It’s a plane! It’s Jon Hilsenrath, doing his best Superman impersonation to lift the stock market on his back before the Fed announcement tomorrow.

Associated Press

The S&P 500 rose 0.8% to 1,998.98, its biggest gain in four weeks, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average gained 0.6% to 17,131.97. The Nasdaq Composite advanced 0.7% to 4,552.76 and the small-company Russell 2000 finished up 0.4% at 1,150.97.

Sure, there was economic data today–producer prices didn’t budge in August, a sign that inflation might not be a worry after all–but the market did little today until a video of the Wall Street Journal’s Jon Hilsenrath, who is often thought to be a mouthpiece for the Fed, hit the web. The resulting bounce caused the Lindsey Group’s Peter Boockvar to dub today’s move”Jon Hilsenrath” rally:

This is a Jon Hilsenrath stock market rally. In a webcast done on WSJ.com, Jon Hilsenrath (just a reporter but one who speaks to many Fed officials) is making the argument that since the economic data hasn't changed much since the July meeting, the Fed will likely keep "significant underutilization" of labor market resources comment in the statement. On the "considerable time" wording, he thinks it stays in the statement but will be qualified as the Fed doesn't want to send any signals on WHEN rates may go up. As I said this morning, a potential "considerable time" change in the wording is just semantics and focus more on whether "significant utilization" stays in or not.

Birinyi’s Rob Leiphart considers the possible changes and what their impact could be:

The last time rates were adjusted was on December 16, 2008, however QE was tapered by $10 bil-lion at the last six meetings. Of the 101 economists surveyed by Bloomberg only one is expecting a change in rates (+0.25%).

The focus tomorrow be on the language surrounding the first rate increase and the completing of the quantitative easing (QE), which should be complete as of the next policy meeting in October.

With the focus surrounding the first rate increase, we put together the table to the right. We have provided, back to 1963, the performance of the S&P 500 three and six months before and after the first rate increase.

And here’s the chart. Let’s just hope we’re nowhere near needing it.

Monday, June 1, 2015

Stoxx 600 takes a breather as Erste Bank drops in Europe

LONDON (MarketWatch) — Austria's benchmark equity index slid by the most in four months on Friday, hit hard after market heavyweight Erste Group Bank AG warned of a hefty annual loss.

Erste Group Bank (AT:EBS) tumbled 16% to 19.48 euros ($26.49) after it said it expects to post a net loss of €1.4 billion to €1.6 billion for 2014 as a result of higher provisions for its units in Hungary and Romania. Annual risk costs will be pushed up to €2.4 billion from the previously expected €1.7 billion, said Erste.

Click to Play Fourth of July for the snobs

This Fourth of July, a number of Americans will be doing their partying VIP-style. That's right, even this most fair-minded and fun of holidays has gone glam. MarketWatch's Charles Passy takes a look at some deals on Lunch Break with Tanya Rivero. Photo: Getty

In Hungary, the government is aiming to cut charges by banks on foreign currency mortgages to aid homeowners struggling in the wake of a weakening in the Hungarian forint. Meanwhile, the Romanian National Bank is working to reduce nonperforming loans before an asset-quality review by the European Central Bank.

Barclays cut its rating on Erste to underweight from equalweight. With Erste the most heavily weighed on Austria's ATX, the stock index was pulled down by 3% to 2,460.31.

Erste was also the biggest decliner on the Stoxx Europe 600 index (XX:SXXP) , which shed 0.3% at 347.95. The index had finished the past three sessions with gains.

Trading volume was lower than usual in Europe on Friday as Wall Street closed for the July 4th holiday. The S&P 500 index (SPX)  and the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA)   ended Thursday at record highs , with the Dow industrials closing above the 17,000 level in the wake of a stronger-than-expected U.S. June jobs reports.

In Paris on Friday, the CAC 40 equity index (FR:PX1)  fell 0.5% to 4,468.98, and Germany's DAX 30 (DX:DAX)  gave up 0.2% to 10,009.08.

But seeing gains Friday were shares of EasyJet PLC (UK:EZJ) , higher by 1% after the British budget airline said the number of passengers it carried in June rose 10.1% to 6.1 million, compared with the year-ago period.

EasyJet nearly topped advancers on the U.K.'s FTSE 100 (UK:UKX) . The index overall edged up less than 1 point to close at 6,866.05.

Meanwhile, British government-services provider Serco Group PLC (UK:SRP)  said Friday it lost a rebid to operate the Docklands Light Railway in London. Its shares declined 0.3%. Serco will continue to service the line through Dec. 7. The DLR franchise generated revenue of about 90 million pounds ($ 154.3 million), or 2% of Serco's overall revenue, at a margin that was well below the average Serco logs on its contracts, it said.

Elsewhere in Europe, shares of Let's Gowex SA (ES:GOW)  remained suspended for a second day in Madrid . The shares tumbled more than 70% on Tuesday and Wednesday combined after short seller Gotham City Research LLC said it believes that more than 90% of revenue reported by the free public Wi-Fi provider "does not exist." Gotham City "does not trust Gowex's reported revenues, and believes Gowex is too good to be true," it said, adding that it estimates actual revenue to be less than €10 million.

Gotham City's claims are "unfounded and defamatory," Gowex said in a Thursday statement, and said it's preparing a report of relevant facts to clarify the company's position.

More news from MarketWatch:

EU warns banks against trading bitcoin

At Wimbledon, will a man outside the 'Big Four' finally win?

Hurricane Arthur strengthens, makes landfall on East Coast

Sunday, May 31, 2015

Stocks open higher as Dow up about 100 points

Stocks were off to a good start Wednesday as the Dow Jones industrial average jumped more than 100 points at the open.

Investors are eagerly awaiting the minutes from the latest meeting of Federal Reserve policymakers to get clues on the potential timing for interest rate hikes.

The Dow Jones industrial average was up 0.8% and the Standard & Poor's 500 index gained 0.5%. The Nasdaq composite index rose 0.6%.

NEW: USA TODAY's live markets blog

The Fed releases the minutes of its April 29-30 meeting at 2 p.m, ET. After that meeting, the Fed said it would further cut its bond purchases because the U.S. job market needed less help.

It also reaffirmed its plan to keep short-term rates low to support the economy "for a considerable time" after its bond purchases end, likely late this year. It offered no specific timetable for a rate increase.

Retailers were in focus again Wednesday. Target said first-quarter profit fell 16% as losses in its Canadian operation and costs of last year's data breach took a toll, The results missed Wall Street estimates. Shares were up 0.1%.

Lowe's stock fell 0.8% after the retailer missed Wall Street estimates.

Overseas, European markets were higher. Britain's FTSE 100 was up 0.1% and Germany's DAX was up 0.6%.

Asian markets were mixed. Japan's Nikkei index fell 0.2% to 14,042.17 and Hong Kong's Hang Seng index was flat at 22,836.52.

Contributing: The Associated Press

Thursday, May 28, 2015

Target Price Increases Abound For J&J, But Stock Slips

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) was giving up some of Tuesday's gains, although analysts were largely upbeat about the company's better-than-expected first-quarter earnings report, as evidenced by a flurry of target price increases.

Citigroup's Matthew Dodds reiterated a Buy rating and raised his target price by $3 to $114: "JNJ's reported results were ahead of the Street and the underlying performance was even stronger as Olysio is off to a torrid start. With Pharma driving overall growth, JNJ's OM is expanding and estimates are rising suggesting additional room for the stock to increase."

Raymond James' Jayson Bedford reiterated an Outperform rating and raised his target price by $5 to $107. "With revenue growth of 5% and operating income growth of 11%, J&J’s growth profile is tracking towards the higher end of its large cap peer group. Although we would like to see more balanced growth, we believe the Pharma business can remain the growth engine in the near-term as J&J repositions its MD&D and consumer portfolios (J&J is divesting businesses in both segments). With $12 billion in net cash (and an estimated $15 billion in FCF generation in 2014), we believe that J&J has the ability to drive even faster growth through M&A/licensing opportunities. We have confidence in our estimates and raise our price target to $107."

S&P Capital IQ's Jeffrey Loo reiterated a Buy rating on the stock and raised his target price by $4 to $110: "Sales rose 3.5%, on strong pharmaceutical sales, up 10.8%, while medical devices and diagnostics were flat and consumer unit down 3.2%. We are encouraged by the pharma sales and look for continued solid growth with strong sales for Olysio, Stelara, and Simponi. JNJ noted Olysio benefit from Liver society guidelines to use with Gilead’s Sovaldi. But we note pricing pressure remains in device unit."

One dissenting voice came from Credit Suisse's Bruce Nudell, who reitaterated an Underperform rating on the stock, but nonetheless raised his target price by $6 to $100: "Although we see JNJ as fairly valued based on our current estimates, we acknowledge that if the company continues to execute in Pharma (for example ARN-509, approval of Olysio with all oral regimens, market share gains for Xarelto & new indications/share gains for Invokana), there may continue to be upside vs. our estimates & assumed valuation."

See Barron's Take on J&J here.

Wednesday, May 27, 2015

Nestle recalls two kinds of Hot Pockets

Nestle voluntarily recalled two of its Hot Pocket products as part of a larger meat recall, according to a company press release Tuesday.

The food company recalled its "Philly Steak and Cheese" and "Croissant Crust Philly Steak and Cheese" Hot Pockets in specific sizes.

These products may have been affected by a recall by Rancho Feeding Corp. last week of 8.7 million pounds of beef product.

Regulators said the company processed "diseased and unsound animals" without a full federal inspection, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

The USDA says the products were unfit for human consumption.

No illnesses have been reported.

The recalled Hot Pockets were distributed nationwide, according to the Nestle release. The company said "a small quantity of meat" from Rancho was used at a California production facility that makes Hot Pockets.

Nestle's press release lists specific batch sizes being recalled. Customers who bought the recalled Hot Pockets can get a refund by contacting Nestle Consumer Services at 800-392-4057.

Follow @JolieLeeDC on Twitter.

Monday, May 25, 2015

Chevron: That Wasn’t Good

Chevron (CVX) is not supposed to do this, drop more than 3% that is. During the past ten years, it’s averaged a 0.05% gain a day and the last time its shares dropped more than 3% was back in Oct. 2012.

Associated Press

But dropping it is. Chevron’s shares have fallen 3.4% to $112.48 today, while Exxon Mobil (XOM), which released earnings yesterday, has dropped 1.3% to $92.75 and ConocoPhillips (COP), which also released earnings yesterday, has declined 0.8% to $65.20.

Chevron released its own earnings today, and let’s just say they stunk. Like French cheese. The Wall Street Journal has the details:

Chevron Corp. said its fourth-quarter profit fell 32% as the energy giant reported lower global production and weaker refined products margins.

Though profit for the period met Wall Street’s expectations, revenue missed expectations by nearly $9 billion.

Chevron’s global oil-equivalent production for the fourth quarter fell to 2.58 million barrels a day from 2.67 million barrels a day a year earlier, hurt by lower production in the U.S. and abroad…

Looking to 2014, the company has said it is planning to spend about $2 billion less on capital and exploratory investments than what was expected last year. And while Chevron, Exxon and others have spent have spent lavishly to boost their oil and gas output, production has been dropping and profits have been muted, even though oil prices are high.

S&P Capital IQ’s Michael Kay cut his rating on Chevron to Buy from Strong Buy:

We cut our ’14 EPS forecast $0.87 to $11.68, and our target price by $14 to $131, on updated forecasts and multiple analysis. Shares are lower on light ’14 production targets and initial ’13 reserve metrics, we think. Q4 EPS of $2.57, vs. $2.99, misses our view by $0.05 on weak refining and rising project costs. [Chevron] sees less than 1% production growth in ’14, lighter than we projected, and we think a 4%-5% growth rate is further out than previously thought. We view valuation metrics and liquids mix as attractive, but production headwinds will likely impede potential upside.

After today’s drop, shares of Chevron are down 9.8% this year, while Exxon is off 8.2% and ConocoPhillips has dropped 7.6%.

Sunday, May 24, 2015

Netflix rings in the new year with new content

If you are a faithful Netflix user, you may have noticed on Jan. 1 that some movies and television shows were no longer listed as streaming options.

Among the prominent titles that disappeared were Titanic, Flashdance, Top Gun, and Braveheart.

Netflix spokeswoman Jenny McCabe says there is no glitch in the system. Every month, as the licenses of movies and television shows expire, they are replaced by new content.

"Titles come and go … it's just part of life," McCabe told USA TODAY Network. "We usually re-license movies and television shows that people are regularly watching, and we choose to not re-license those that people are not watching."

The good news for Netflix users is a number of movies and television shows have been added as streaming options.

Below is a list of many of the titles added since Jan. 1. Happy streaming!

Dexter: Seasons 5-8
Duplex
Drinking Buddies
Good Ol' Freda
Jack Reacher
The Talented Mr. Ripley
American Psycho
Raging Bull
Thelma And Louise
West Side Story
What's Eating Gilbert Grape
Big Trouble in Little China
Breakfast at Tiffany's
Bull Durham
Red Dawn
Mousehunt
Spaceballs
Star Trek: The Motion Picture
Amelie
Grapes of Wrath
Planes, Trains, and Automobiles
Children of a Lesser God
Tora! Tora! Tora!
Ghost
Play It Again, Sam

Follow @AshMWill on Twitter.

Wednesday, May 20, 2015

Mortgage manager in $2B deal over loan abuses

WASHINGTON (AP) — Ocwen Financial will reduce struggling borrowers' loan balances by $2 billion in an agreement with federal regulators and 49 states over foreclosure abuses.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and state attorneys general announced the deal Thursday with the Atlanta-based company, one of the largest U.S. mortgage servicers. The regulators said Ocwen pushed borrowers into foreclosure through illegal actions, such as failing to promptly and accurately credit mortgage payments.

The company also miscalculated interest rates and charged borrowers improper fees, the regulators said.

"We believe that Ocwen violated federal consumer financial laws at every stage of the mortgage servicing process," CFPB Director Richard Cordray said in a conference call with reporters. "We have concluded that Ocwen made troubled borrowers even more vulnerable to foreclosure."

MORTGAGE RATES: Average 30-year rate moves up to 4.47%

Under the agreement, Ocwen also will refund a combined $125 million to about 185,000 borrowers who had been foreclosed upon from 2009 through 2012. It also agreed to change the way it manages mortgages. The company must stop "robo-signing" of documents, the practice of automatically signing off on foreclosures without a proper review.

The agreement must be approved by a federal court in Washington.

Ocwen said in a statement it was pleased to have reached the settlement.

The agreement "is in alignment with the same ultimate goals that we share with the regulators — to prevent foreclosures and help struggling families keep their homes," the company said.

Ocwen is the fourth-largest mortgage servicer in the country and the biggest that isn't a bank. It specializes in servicing high-risk mortgages. Servicing companies collect payments from borrowers and handle customer services, loan modifications and foreclosures.

Federal and state regulators have signed agreements with a number of large banks and mortgage processing compa! nies over foreclosure abuses.

Ocwen's compliance with the settlement will be overseen by Joseph A. Smith Jr., the monitor for the $25 billion settlement reached in February 2012 between the federal government and the states and five major banks — Ally Financial, Bank of America, Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo.

The housing crisis struck starting in 2007, as home values sank and millions of borrowers defaulted on their mortgages. The crisis brought more than 4 million foreclosures. Some mortgage-servicing companies had processed foreclosures without verifying documents.

The CFPB, 49 states and the District of Columbia signed the agreement with Ocwen. Oklahoma is the only state that isn't participating.

The largest share of the mortgage relief, an estimated $342 million, is expected to go to Florida. The state's attorney general, Pam Bondi, said during the conference call that Florida has the highest foreclosure rate in the U.S.

Tuesday, May 19, 2015

Consumer Confidence Tanked During Debt Ceiling Debacle

Young businessman checking his walletAlamy The ugly fight in Washington that shut down the government and nearly failed to raise the debt limit took a serious toll on consumer confidence. The Conference Board's monthly Consumer Confidence Index was released Tuesday, and it showed that people's confidence in the U.S. economy dipped sharply in October. In one month, the confidence index fell from 80.2 to 71.2, and the nonprofit that publishes the survey pointed the finger at the budget crisis. "Consumer confidence deteriorated considerably as the federal government shutdown and debt-ceiling crisis took a particularly large toll on consumers' expectations," wrote Lynn Franco, Director of Economic Indicators at The Conference Board. Franco went on to note that similar dips have been observed last year during the "fiscal cliff" debate and during the last government shutdown in the mid-1990s. The Conference Board isn't alone in its assessment that the shutdown hurt consumer confidence: Last week's Thomson Reuters/University of Michigan consumer confidence survey found that confidence in the economy had reached its lowest ebb since December 2012. Consumer confidence is a closely watched economic indicator, and the troublesome reports come just a month before the official kick-off of the holiday shopping season. And that could spell trouble for the retail industry and the economy as a whole. "With the holiday shopping season around the corner, consumers have been shaken by all the political turmoil in Washington," wrote IHS Global Insights economist Chris Christopher in an email. "Looking ahead, we expect consumer confidence to gain traction in the upcoming months; however, confidence falls faster than it rises." There is a potential silver lining for consumers, though -- as Christopher points out, retailers will be discounting heavily to convince shoppers to shake off their worries and get to the mall.

Monday, May 18, 2015

These High Dividend Stocks Can Withstand Rising Rates, Morgan Stanley Says

If this year’s hit to dividend-paying sectors taught us anything, it’s that rising Treasury yields can be dangerous for income-producing stocks. That leaves investors in a bind. Do you by high-dividend payers and hope for the best or give up on income completely?

Bloomberg News

Well, Morgan Stanley yesterday released a report that looks for stocks with a dividend yield of at least 3% but who’s fundamentals should allow it to hold up just fine, even if rates rise. Its analysts started by looking for stocks with payout ratios of less than 75%, low debt and net income compound annual return of at least 5%. They looked at the historical tendency of the stocks to Treasury rates, the S&P 500 and the Dow Jones US Select Dividend Index. They asked their analysts to recommend stocks with little near-term debt maturing, stocks that would benefit from an improving US economy and inflation protection features. And they came up with a list of 20.

Abbvie (ABBV)
Ameren Corp. (AEE)
Arthur J. Gallagher (AJG)
E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co. (DD)
ENSCO (ESV)
Enterprise Products Partners LP (EPD)
General Mills (GIS)
H&R Block (HRB)
Hancock Holding (HBHC)
Kraft Foods Group (KRFT)
Lorillard (LO)
Magellan Midstream Partners LP (MMP)
MarkWest Energy Partners L P (MWE)
McDonald’s (MCD)
Microchip Technology (MCHP)
NextEra Energy (NEE)
Regency Centers (REG)
TELUS Corp. (TU)
West Corp. (WSTC)
Williams Companies (WMB)

The stocks with the lowest correlation include Hancock Holding, Telus, WestCorp and MarkWest.

 

Wednesday, May 13, 2015

5 Reasons the Holiday Shopping Season Starts Early This Year

young females wearing summer clothes on hot sunny day bemused at early christmas shop window displayAlamy For almost as long as Christmas has been a commercialized holiday, there have been complaints about "Christmas Creep" -- the tendency for retailers to launch holiday sales and advertising earlier and earlier every year. This year, it seems to be worse than ever. We're already seeing the first commercials for Christmas shopping, and major retailers like Kmart (SHLD), Toys R Us and Walmart (WMT) are eagerly telling us what toys they expect to be top sellers this season. And Christmas is still three months away. "It does feel like the holidays begin earlier every year," says Alison Kenney Paul, head of the retail practice at Deloitte. As it turns out, there are a few reasons why Christmas Creep has been taken to new heights this year. No Presidential Election. Last year, two men stood in the way of the inexorable spread of Christmas: Mitt Romney and Barack Obama. The presidential election served as a bulwark of sorts, holding the public's attention and making it more expensive for retailers to run television ads in October. This year, retailers have free rein to take over the airwaves in the fall, and you can expect them to take advantage. "Between paid political advertising and media attention, the election crowded out the ability for retailers to get their message out there earlier," says Paul. "We'll see more advertising and promotions earlier this year." A Late Black Friday. Every year, Thanksgiving falls on the fourth Thursday of November, with Black Friday coming the next day (well, in theory). But this year, the first of November falls on a Friday, which means that Thanksgiving (Nov 28) and Black Friday (Nov. 29) are as late as they can possibly be. "It is a shorter season than last year," says Paul. "You do have this phenomenon every few years where there's fewer days between Thanksgiving and Christmas." Think retailers are really going to wait around until Nov. 29 to roll out their big promotional efforts? Think again. While Black Friday will still be a big deal, its late arrival means that many retailers will place more emphasis on pre-Black Friday deals and promotions. "I think there will be a first wave of promotions before black Friday," says Jeff Feinberg, a retail industry veteran and a managing director with Alvarez & Marsal Private Equity Services. A Ridiculously Early Hanukkah. The late Thanksgiving is also intersecting with an unusually early Hanukkah -- in fact, the first night of the Jewish holiday falls on the evening Thanksgiving, which means Jewish shoppers really cant wait until Black Friday to do their shopping. And by the time Cyber Monday rolls around, the holiday will be more than half over. That's raised the specter of a second Black Friday aimed specifically at Jewish shoppers; we think it's more likely that this will simply be another reason for retailer to roll out promotions earlier in the season. Still, it's important to remember that only about 2 percent of the American population are Jewish, so this is a minor factor in the grand scheme of things. Paul says that while the early Hannukah gives retailers another platform to talk about the holidays, Jews are generally "too small a group to move the needle." Still, you may see a small effect on promotional activity in regions with heavy Jewish populations. (In some major markets in New York, Florida and California, for example, Jews represent a much higher percentage of shoppers -- one that retailers can't afford to ignore.) More Focus on Low-Income Shoppers. Walmart officially kicked off the holiday season back in August, when it announced its holiday layaway program. Meanwhile, Kmart aired what seems to be the first official holiday commercial of the season -- an ad for its layaway program. See a pattern? These discount retailers aren't doing a good enough job of connecting with the low-income shoppers who are supposed to be their bread-and-butter -- which is why they're offering services like free layaway in hopes of winning them back. And layaway, by its nature, needs to start early. So while some may rage at the absurdity of promoting Christmas shopping in September, keep in mind that these ads aren't necessarily aimed at you -- they're for the paycheck-to-paycheck shoppers who will benefit by putting toys on layaway now so they can pay for Christmas later. "Economic Headwinds." This has become a favorite phrase of retail executives who struggle to explain why their sales are weak, though Feinberg says that such concerns are somewhat exaggerated. "We're not in a meltdown; we don't have a flurry of companies shutting down factories," he says. Still, he notes that there's less hiring and stagnated wages, along with general concerns around gas prices and government gridlock. All of these factors have conspired to keep American purse strings relatively tight, and that's going to have skittish retailers eager to get out ahead of the competition -- especially in the wake of relatively light back-to-school sales. So all signs point toward an earlier shopping season. That's a strategy we're already seeing from Toys R Us, which earlier this month started offering big deals for early shoppers. At the time, we suggested that you take retailers up on the offer if the deals are good and you want to avoid the malls in December. But the same factors that are pushing retailers toward an earlier holiday shopping season might also dictate caution to the deal-hunting consumer. "At the first indication that things aren't going well, retailers are not going to wait a week for things to pick up," says Feinberg. "If Black Friday weekend is mediocre, I suspect those first two weeks of December will be huge for the consumer." As retailers start pushing sales and promotions over the next month, by all means listen to what they have to say. But if they're desperate enough to start running Christmas ads in September, they may also be desperate enough to go discount-crazy in December. Stay tuned.

Tuesday, May 12, 2015

EV Energy Partners to Acquire Natural Gas Properties from Carrizo (EVEP, CRZO)

EV Energy Partners, L.P. (EVEP) announced on Friday that it will acquire natural gas assets from Carrizo Oil and Gas, Inc (CRZO).

With the help of institutional partnerships managed by EnerVest, EVEP will acquire a 31% stake in natural gas properties in the Barnett Shale from CRZO for $67.6 million. Including the partnerships managed by EnerVest, the deal will be worth a total of $218 million.

The deal has been approved by the board of directors of both companies and is expected to be finalized on October 31. The assets include 82 wells and over 17,000 gross acres.

EV Energy shares were mostly flat during pre-market trading Friday. The stock is down 36% YTD.

Sunday, May 10, 2015

10 Worst Charities in America

Well-run charities in the U.S. use their own staff to raise funds, and spend most of the donations on easily verifiable activities. Experts say a charity should spend less than 35 cents on the dollar for fundraising.

The underbelly of the charity game looks a lot different.

A report published last week by the Tampa Bay Times and The Center for Investigative Reporting, based on a year-long investigation, identified some 6,000 charities that pay huge shares of their donations to for-profit companies to raise money for them.

These 501(c)(3) outfits gull donors by adopting popular causes or calling themselves names similar to those of well-known charities, according to the report. “The nation’s 50 worst charities have paid their solicitors nearly $1 billion over the past 10 years that could have gone to charitable works,” the report said.

Based on their names, 14 of the 50 charities supported law enforcers, firefighters or paramedics; 13 focused on children; 10 took up cancer as a cause; and six supported military veterans.

(Check out 6 Bad Athlete Charities on AdvisorOne.)

The report’s findings include the following:

Following are the 10 worst offenders based on cash paid to solicitors in the past decade as identified by the Times and CIR.

State trooper vehicle on highway patrol. (Photo: AP)10. Children’s Cancer Fund of America

Total raised by solicitors: $37.5 million

Paid to solicitors: $29.2 million

Percentage spent on direct cash aid: 5.3%

 

9. American Association of State Troopers

Total raised by solicitors: $45 million

Paid to solicitors: $36 million

Percentage spent on direct cash aid: 8.6%

A SWAT team. (Photo: AP)8. National Veterans Service Fund

Total raised by solicitors: $70.2 million

Paid to solicitors: $36.9 million

Percentage spent on direct cash aid: 7.8%

 

7. International Union of Police Associations, AFL-CIO

Total raised by solicitors: $57.2 million

Paid to solicitors: $41.4 million

Percentage spent on direct cash aid: 0.5%

6. Breast Cancer Relief Foundation

Total raised by solicitors: $63.9 million

Paid to solicitors: $44.8 million

Percentage spent on direct cash aid: 2.2%

 

5. Firefighters Charitable Foundation         

Total raised by solicitors: $63.8 million

Paid to solicitors: $54.7 million

Percentage spent on direct cash aid: 8.4%

Pink breast cancer ribbon4. American Breast Cancer Foundation

Total raised by solicitors: $80.8 million

Paid to solicitors: $59.8 million

Percentage spent on direct cash aid: 5.3%

 

3. Children’s Wish Foundation International

Total raised by solicitors: $96.8 million

Paid to solicitors: $63.6 million

Percentage spent on direct cash aid: 10.8%

2. Cancer Fund of America

Total raised by solicitors: $98 million

Paid to solicitors: $80.4 million

Percentage spent on direct cash aid: 0.9%

 

1. Kids Wish Network

Total raised by solicitors: $127.8 million

Paid to solicitors: $109.8 million

Percentage spent on direct cash aid: 2.5%

---

Check out 6 Bad Athlete Charities on AdvisorOne.

Tuesday, April 28, 2015

Investing Basics: Avoiding Confirmation Bias

I am reading the excellent book, "The Little Book of Behavioral Investing" by James Montier. In this book, he talks about pitfalls every human encounters when making decisions when there is either a) insufficient information b) the problem is complex or ill-structured c) the goal is not well defined d) high stress/high stakes e) decision relies on interaction with others.

We recognize that investing has each of these characteristics and to become a better investor we need to learn how to control our baser instincts. Sometimes, it is near impossible to do so unless you know the pitfalls.

The pitfall that caught my eye is confirmation bias. I have succumbed to this more often than I would like and the reason was that I never realized that I am doing it.

Confirmation bias is the tendency to favor information that confirms our belief or hypothesis. This means that you ignore information which does not sit well with what you think, remember information selectively or interpret it in a biased way. You fall to confirmation bias when you do these things (it is easy to come up with more elements on this list):
You think that a company is cheap, so you Google for articles that have a buy recommendation. Or you look for reports by analysts who think that the stock is going to go up.You flock to the club your views agree with and shun those which have a different tone. For example, value investors ignoring momentum investors because they think that the momentum investing is somehow beneath them or is clearly not "investment." Even less drastic is value investing vs dividend investing. If you look at the people who are into dividend investing, they like to read/talk to people who are into dividend investing too and vice versa.Ignoring information that is counter to your thesis. You may justify the information by saying that this is an anomaly and will not happen again (say when a company reports bad earnings for a quarter). You can choose to justify a second bad earning in the next quart! er as an extended bad spell and a time to buy further, ignoring the warnings of people who clearly do not fit your view of the world.Democrats reading NY times and watching MSNBC and Republicans doing the same thing with Wall Street Journal and Fox News.When you think a stock is cheap and it jumps 10-20% in a week or so, you like it more and maybe buy it, if it drops again.
Montier describes a simple yet ingenious test to show this bias in practice.

Imagine you are faced with the following sequence of numbers: 2-4-6. Your job is to figure out the rule I used to construct this sequence. To uncover the rule you may construct other sets of three numbers and I will give you a feedback as to whether they satisfy the rule I used. If you are sure you have the solution, you may stop testing and tell me what you think the rule is.
Given this test, most people let their emotional side of the brain take over. They ask for a feedback on 4-6-8 and say 100-102-104 and when the answer for both of them is affirmative, they stop and say "any numbers that increase in increments of two."

This is the wrong solution as the rule was "any ascending number sequence." Can you recognize the confirmation bias here? As soon as you see the sequence 2-4-6 you come up with the hypothesis that this is a sequence where each consecutive number is an increment of 2 from the previous one. You test your hypothesis by polling for sequences which fit your hypothesis.

This is clearly the wrong way to go about it. To test a hypothesis, it is best to look for information that disagrees with the hypothesis and not information that agrees with it. To explain it better, I will describe another experiment where you see it more clearly.

Let us suppose that after investing a significant amount of time you come up with a winning formula for investing (there is one by Joel Greenblatt, for example). The formula is quite simple and says that if some conditions are true then the stock will double in three years. Now! , how do ! you test if your formula works? Let us consider these three options:
You look at stocks that satisfied your formula and doubled within three years.You look at stocks which doubled within three years and verified that your formula holds true for them.You look at stocks that satisfy your formula and did not double within three years.
The general tendency is to check 1) and maybe 2) (which you will probably notice what most analysts and sometimes book writers do). But clearly the test for this formula is 3). If you find a company that satisfied your formula but did not double then obviously your formula does not work. It does not matter if your formula works on thousands of stocks! If it fails on one then it is not true.

Karl Popper, an English philosopher, observed that the only way to test a hypothesis is to look for all the information that disagrees with it. This process is called falsification.

The question now is: Can the confirmation bias be sidestepped? The first step towards this actually is to step back from your decision and recognize that it suffers from confirmation bias. For example, suppose Vivendi was on your watchlist for stocks to buy if it dropped below €11. A few days back you read that Seth Klarman bought shares. You have read Klarman's "Margin of Safety" and have seen his track record. You think that if it is good enough for Klarman in terms of return, it is good enough for you. Note that you have done your due diligence before putting the company in your watchlist and you are not blindly following Klarman.

This still is confirmation bias. You must have come up with a margin of safety calculation and had felt that €11 is the cutoff price given your investment goals. Recognizing that this is the case is half the battle. Once you recognize that you are suffering from confirmation bias, you should start with a clean slate. Ignore that Klarman bought shares. Re-evaluate the company and see if it makes sense to invest at the current price.

A good examp! le is als! o (as Montier points out) the checklist by Bruce Berkowitz on killing the company. Think of all the things that can go wrong with your investment. If you still can't kill the company and there is a sufficient margin of safety, only then you should make an investment decision.

Carnival Stays Underperform - Analyst Blog

We remain Underperform on cruise operator Carnival Corp. (CCL), given its mixed second-quarter fiscal 2013 results, successive slash in guidance, and lingering European crisis.

Why the Reiteration?

Although Carnival's second-quarter fiscal 2013 adjusted earnings beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 50%, its revenues missed the same. Both earnings per share and revenues slipped year over year. A lower net revenue yield owing to reduced pricing led to the decline in revenues, which when combined with higher cruise costs marred earnings.

Moreover, Carnival is facing one ordeal after another. After the grounding of its ship, Costa Concordia, in Italy in Jan 2012, the engine of its Triumph cruise ship caught fire in Feb 2013, which hurt the company's fiscal 2013 guidance. Even though the company is recovering at a slow but steady pace from the Concordia grounding disaster, it continues to be a cause of concern for the company.

Lower bookings, voyage cancellations and higher costs compelled Carnival to trim its fiscal 2013 earnings guidance twice in a span of six months. Earnings for fiscal 2013 are now expected to remain in the range of $1.45—$1.65 versus $1.80—$2.10 per share expected earlier (announced in May 2013).

Prior to this, Carnival reduced its earnings guidance from the range of $2.20−$2.40 to $1.80–$2.10 per share. Consecutive cuts in earnings guidance within a span of six months raised concerns about the near-term outlook of the company.

Last but not least, Carnival's European operations will prove to be challenging even in fiscal 2013 due to the sovereign debt crisis, which has lowered consumer spending. On the pricing front, EAA (Europe, Australia & Asia) witnessed softer trends even before Costa was grounded.

Apart from pricing, overall occupancy and booking volume are also expected to remain low for European cruises for the rest of 2013. Carnival currently retains a Zacks Rank #5 (strong Sell).

Others Stocks to Co! nsider

Players in the leisure and recreational industry, which look attractive at current levels, include Ambassadors Group Inc. (EPAX), International Speedway Corp. (ISCA) and Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH), all carrying a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy).

Monday, April 20, 2015

2 Basic Materials Stocks With Big Volume to Watch

DELAFIELD, Wis. (Stockpickr) -- Professional traders running mutual funds and hedge funds don't just look at a stock's price moves; they also track big changes in volume activity. Often when above-average volume moves into an equity, it precedes a large spike in volatility.

Major moves in volume can signal unusual activity, such as insider buying or selling -- or buying or selling by "superinvestors."

Unusual volume can also be a major signal that hedge funds and momentum traders are piling into a stock ahead of a catalyst. These types of traders like to get in well before a large spike, so it's always a smart move to monitor unusual volume. That said, remember to combine trend and price action with unusual volume. Put them all together to help you decipher the next big trend for any stock.

With that in mind, let's take a look at several stocks rising on unusual volume today.

Energy Transfer Equity

Energy Transfer Equity (ETE) owns and operates natural gas gathering systems, natural gas intrastate pipeline systems and gas processing plants. This stock closed up 1.8% at $66.21 in Wednesday's trading session.

Wednesday's Volume: 4.58 million

Three-Month Average Volume: 1.28 million

Volume % Change: 321%

From a technical perspective, ETE spiked higher here right off some near-term support at $63.90 with heavy upside volume. This move pushed shares of ETE into new 52-week high territory, since the stock took out some resistance at $66.97. At last check, ETE hit an intraday high of $67.90 with volume that was substantially above its three-month average action of 1.28 million shares.

Traders should now look for long-biased trades in ETE as long as it's trending above support at $63.90 or above more support at $62 and then once it sustains a move or close above its new 52-week high at $67.90 with volume that's near or above 1.28 million shares. If we get that move soon, then ETE will set up to enter new 52-week-high territory, which is bullish technical price action. Some possible upside targets off that move are $70 to $75.

USEC

USEC (USU) is a global energy company, which is a supplier of low enriched uranium for commercial nuclear power plants. This stock closed up 3.9% at $18.31 in Wednesday's trading session.

Wednesday's Volume: 1.02 million

Three-Month Average Volume: 512,580

Volume % Change: 172%

From a technical perspective, USU bounced sharply higher here right above some near-term support at $16.11 with strong upside volume. This stock recently pulled back sharply from $29.12 to $15.05 with heavy downside volume flows. Following that pullback, shares of USU have started to stabilize and trend sideways between $15.05 on the downside and $21.36 on the upside. This move is now starting to push shares of USU within range of triggering a near-term breakout trade. That trade will hit if USU manages to clear some near-term overhead resistance levels at $20 to $21.36 with high volume.

Traders should now look for long-biased trades in USU as long as it's trending above $15.05 and then once it sustains a move or close above those breakout levels with volume that's near or above 512,580 shares. If that breakout hits soon, then USU will set up to re-test or possibly take out it next major overhead resistance levels at $28 to $29. A more measured move to $24 or $25 might be all we get if that breakout triggers, so adjust accordingly to what the stock gives you.

To see more stocks rising on unusual volume, check out the Stocks Rising On Unusual Volume portfolio on Stockpickr.

-- Written by Roberto Pedone in Delafield, Wis.

Wednesday, April 15, 2015

Avis Pays More for Payless Car Rental

Seeking to expand its car rental business into the deep-value market, Avis Budget Group (NASDAQ: CAR  ) announced this morning that it's acquiring the sixth largest car rental agency, Payless Car Rental, for $50 million cash.

With Avis already sporting more the 10,000 locations in 175 countries, the 120 locations in the U.S., Canada, Europe, and South America that Payless brings with it won't bulk up operations so much, but it does give it a foot into the fast-growing deep-value end of the market and differentiates its eponymous premium offerings and mid-tier Budget brand.

Payless generated $80 million in annual revenues and Avis plans to operate the business as a separate entity from a customer perspective.

Believing the transaction will generate an attractive return on its investment, Avis Budget Group Chairman and CEO Ronald L. Nelson said, "Payless expands our global footprint, enables us to support Budget's mid-tier brand positioning, and gives us greater flexibility to capitalize on opportunities in an additional segment of the car rental market in order to help accelerate our growth."

Three companies control 95% of the car rental market: Hertz, privately held Enterprise Rent-a-Car, and Avis, which also owns Zipcar, the world's leading car sharing network, with more than 790,000 members.

Congress Restores Funding for Combat Flights

At long last, America is flying CAP again.

Air Force and Navy fighter jets returned to the skies Monday, as $1.8 billion in overseas contingency operations funding from Congress restored $423 million needed to pay for aerial operations.


F-22 Raptors training over Wake Island, Source: Air Combat Command

In a statement, Air Combat Command clarified that the funds in question had been previously been cut from its budget because of sequestration. Air Combat Commander Gen. Mike Hostage noted that as a result of these cuts, "since April we've been in a precipitous decline with regard to combat readiness."

The return of funding "reinstates critical training and test operations for the [combat air forces] fleet across the Air Force for the remainder of FY13. This impacts not just Air Combat Command units, but also CAF units assigned to United States Air Forces Europe and Pacific Air Forces." Funding has also been restored for the Air Warfare Center's Weapons School, for Aggressors (U.S. squadrons trained to play the role of "the bad guys" in training missions) and the Thunderbirds aerial demonstration team.

Air Combat Command did not say whether the funds released Monday were related to the $2.3 billion in jet fuel supply contracts awarded to ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM  ) and other major oil suppliers, announced by the Department of Defense in June. In any event, funds authorized by Congress to reinstate these flight missions will only pay for flights through October 1. After that, and absent new funding, flight time will have to be cut again.

Sunday, April 5, 2015

Use Market Fear To Generate Double-Digit Income

About a year ago, I set out to find a winning income strategy... A strategy that can generate "Instant Income" in any market environment. 

And now seems to be a good time for income investors to start considering it. 

Why? Because rising interest rates may hurt some dividend-paying stocks in the months ahead. As Bespoke Investment Group co-founder Paul Hickey put it this week: "It doesn't take much of a move in interest rates ... to make a lot of stock dividend yields quickly look considerably less attractive."  

 
And as dividend stocks become less attractive, your risk of losing money by holding the wrong ones increases.

Sure enough, as USA Today pointed out, high-yielding utilities -- an income investor favorite -- have lost around 10% since Bernanke's May 21 announcement that the Fed's bond buying program is likely to begin tapering off later this year.

Now, don't get me wrong. I'm not saying you should avoid dividend stocks altogether, but now may be the time to try an alternative approach to collecting income. That's what this strategy is for.

From July 2012 to this January, I put my "Instant Income" strategy through a rigorous test to prove my system worked in real-life trading scenarios. The results were even better than I expected. I helped readers generate thousands of dollars in income on my way to an 84% win rate, without them having to own a single share of stock.

Since then, I've launched a newsletter service to help investors navigate the world of options... and the results are even more impressive -- every single trade I've closed has been a winner. That's one winning income trade a week since Feb. 6. You can see all 16 closed trades here.

My "Instant Income" strategy allows investors to do one of two things: either earn large amounts of income... or buy high-quality stocks at a deep discount. Either way, it's usually a win-win.

The strategy involves selling puts on undervalued, high-quality stocks. It's a strategy that allows you to generate what I call "Instant Income" because when you sell a put contract, money is immediately deposited into your brokerage account... money you keep no matter how the trade turns out.

It's one of the smartest, highest-percentage winning strategies in the financial world.

To recap, "put" options give investors the right -- but not the obligation -- to sell a stock at a specified price before a specified date, known as the expiration date. Selling a put obligates us to purchase that stock from the put buyer if it falls below a specified price, known as the option's strike price. When we accept that obligation, we receive cash, or what I call "Instant Income," upfront, known as a premium.

And even during a volatile month that saw the S&P 500 fall 5.8% from its peak, every put with a June expiration date expired worthless, meaning the income we collected from selling puts is pure profit:

The chart speaks for itself. With my "Instant Income" strategy, I'm earning average returns of about 9% every 40 days. In fact, if you're an income investor, think of these returns as "yields" on the capital set aside to make these income trades. But what makes them even sweeter than traditional income investing is that I'm not holding these for an entire year to collect these returns -- I get paid upfront. 

And although the market has been volatile lately -- the CBOE Volatility Index (VIX) is up 30% in three months -- I'm not concerned. In fact, higher volatility allows me to generate even more income.

You see, option prices are determined by several factors, including the underlying stock's price, the exercise price and the amount of time until the expiration date.

But one major pricing factor that is a little more complicated is volatility.

We can get a general idea of whether volatility is high or low by looking at the VIX, also known as the "fear index." The VIX tends to rise as the market falls and traders become more anxious. On the other hand, when market prices rise, the VIX tends to decline.

That's great news for followers of my "Instant Income" strategy, because we are sellers of options, not buyers. We want them to be more expensive. That's makes it easier to find options that deliver a lot of income. And I'm taking advantage of the spike in the VIX to collect even more income while I can.

Action to Take --> Selling puts during times of high volatility is the ultimate way to be greedy when others are fearful. When most investors are panicking, options sellers can take advantage of the opportunity by selling expensive options... and generating thousands of dollars in "Instant Income."

P.S. -- Using this kind of strategy has never been easier... and once you get the hang of it, you can use it on thousands of stocks to earn a stream of income -- even if they don't pay a dividend. As I mentioned, every single one of my trades so far has been a winner, with many of them essentially paying double-digit yields. If you'd like to learn more about my "Instant Income" strategy, you can watch a presentation I put together here. 

Sunday, March 29, 2015

Why InnerWorkings Shares Tumbled

Although we don't believe in timing the market or panicking over market movements, we do like to keep an eye on big changes -- just in case they're material to our investing thesis.

What: Shares of InnerWorkings (NASDAQ: INWK  ) were falling apart today, dropping as much as 25% after the promotional specialist cut its full-year guidance ahead of its first-quarter report.

So what: InnerWorkings, which provides printed and promotional materials for businesses, said that it was trimming its 2013 to revenue outlook to a range of $900 million to $930 million, down from a previous range of $930 million to $960 million, and revising EPS guidance to $0.45-$0.50 from a previously projected range of $0.57-$0.61. InnerWorkings said the lower guidance was due to a change in management at a large client, and its decision to do some of its business with one of InnerWorkings' competitors.

Now what: Even with the drop in revenue and profit expectations, InnerWorkings still sees EPS increasing by 10% to 22% this year. Today's drop may be hard to stomach for shareholders, but the loss of the client doesn't point to any other structural weaknesses in the company. Its recent acquisition of DB Studios should provide an additional growth outlet. At this point, there seems to be no good reason to sell.

Stay up to date on Innerworkings. Add the company to your Watchlist by clicking here.  

Thursday, March 26, 2015

Drivers Saved Billions on Gas Last Year; '15 Could Be Huge

Oil Plunge Below 50 Tony Dejak/APRegular gas is advertised for $1.94 a gallon at a gas station in Cleveland. NEW YORK -- The price of gasoline fell below $2 a gallon last week in two states, Missouri and Oklahoma. That's the first time gas has fallen that low since 2009. The price has declined overall by $1.06 in the past 95 days, according to AAA's Daily Fuel Gauge Report, and by $1.38 a gallon since June. The price decline in oil (at $51 a barrel) and gasoline this week has been a savings bonanza for drivers. According to AAA: The current national average for a gallon of gasoline is $2.28, giving consumers savings of 11 cents a gallon compared with a week earlier, and 49 cents a gallon in the past 30 days compared with the month before. American drivers also saved $1.02 from Jan. 1, 2014, to Thursday. Drivers saved $14 billion last year compared with 2013, according to AAA. Compared with 2012, consumers saved $22 billion. On a per-household basis, Americans saved $115 each from lower gas prices in 2014. "U.S. drivers ended the year on a high-note with gas prices plummeting over the last few months," AAA spokesman Avery Ash says. "Cheaper gas prices have helped to improve the economy by boosting both consumer confidence and disposable income." The high point for gasoline prices last year was April 28, when the national average stood at $3.70 a gallon; the lowest point was Dec. 31, when the average gallon of gas hit $2.26. On a geographic basis, it really paid to drive in the South, with South Carolina, Missouri, Mississippi, Tennessee and Arkansas all ranking among the year's lowest average gasoline prices. Hawaii had the highest average ($4.16, compared with $3.34 in South Carolina), with California, Connecticut and New York drivers also seeing higher prices than the rest of the country. AAA expects gas prices to remain relatively low this year, although there are no guarantees. This year promises to provide "much bigger savings to consumers as long as crude oil remains relatively cheap," Ash says. "It would not be surprising for U.S. consumers to save $50 billion to $75 billion on gasoline in 2015 if prices remain low."

Monday, March 23, 2015

A Radical Cure for the Ills of Payday Lending: Transparency

payday lenders Getty Images There is no force greater than a reasonably free market economy, but it can only exist if: Companies compete for your business. In other words, there is more than one choice. (No monopolies allowed.) Consumers have the ability to compare, ditch and switch. They can, with a little effort, understand the true cost of competing products, make informed decisions, and change suppliers easily. Companies producing products that no one wants to buy can fail. They will go out of business, and the people who invested in the business will lose their investments. When consumers have choice and transparency, and when companies are never too big to fail, amazing things can happen. The market will be brutal to companies without a compelling product or value. And it will disproportionally reward those who create real value for consumers. Unfortunately, the forces of the market usually don't reach consumer financial products. But, when true markets are created, the results can be dramatic. Price Comparison Sites Work Amazingly Well in U.K. In the United Kingdom, price comparison websites have revolutionized financial services, particularly auto insurance. If you want to buy auto insurance, you can visit a website, enter a few pieces of personal information and immediately see real personalized quotes from most major auto insurance companies. These are not estimates based upon public records or reverse-engineered guesses based upon the clever work of a computer scientist. The auto insurance companies share their pricing information with the price comparison websites. Thus, all three conditions of the market are met. Consumers can go to one website and see the cost of the products being offered. It is very easy to compare, ditch and switch online. And no auto insurance company has a handout from the government. If they don't compete for business, they will fail. Most importantly, the price comparison websites show the cheapest products first, not the products that pay the highest commissions. To be the top recommendation, you have to be offering the best price. Auto Insurance Premiums Have Fallen 30 Percent -- Over There And the result? Since 2011, auto insurance premiums have dropped by more than 30 percent. In the last 12 months, auto insurance premiums dropped a staggering 19.3 percent. How can prices keep going down? The pressure of the market is forcing companies to innovate. They are improving their underwriting models. They are investing in better fraud detection and claims handling processes. But they are doing all of this to lower premiums so that they can stay alive, not because they plan on making more money. The market is forcing them to compete. And it is brutal. Compare the U.K. market to the U.S. auto insurance market, where insurance premiums are generally increasing. One website, www.leaky.com, tried to bring transparency to the auto insurance market. Not surprisingly, the auto insurance companies were not interested in transparency. In fact, the company received a cease-and-desist order every two months of its existence from insurance companies trying to stop it. Eventually, fighting the litigation became too much, and the startup had to shut down its product. Think about what that means to you: Big insurance companies sued a tiny company into oblivion solely because they don't want you to know how much their products cost. And the auto insurance companies are still fighting hard to ensure that it remains difficult for consumers to compare, ditch and switch. And Now Consider Payday Loans Thanks to true price comparison websites, the U.K. consumer has enjoyed ever-reducing insurance premiums, ever-increasing low-rate balance-transfer durations (you can now borrow at 0 percent for 34 months in the U.K.) and ever-lower personal loan interest rates (with excellent credit, it is easy to get a 5.1 percent interest rate). Regulators there have taken note and would like to unleash the power of the market on one of the worst corners of financial services: Payday loans. As the Guardian reported last week, the competition regulator is going to force payday lenders to share their pricing information with price comparison websites. Payday lenders offer short-term loans to consumers who have no other options. On average, payday lenders charge between $15 to $20 for every $100 that you borrow for 14 days. But the real money is made when borrowers roll over the loan. When the debt comes due in 14 days, the borrower has two choices. They can pay back the $100 borrowed or pay another $15 to $20 to extend the loan for another 14 days. According the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau, 80 percent of borrowers roll over their loans. Hidden fees can often add up to far more than amount of the loan. Short-term loans turn into long-term loans, loaded with fees, generating annual percentage rates in excess of 1,000 percent. Payday Lenders Scheme Around the Rules Attempts to regulate payday lending have been a complete failure, on both sides of the Atlantic. Payday lenders are clever and find ways of getting around every rule designed to hem them in. In fact, a number of U.S. payday lenders are incorporated on Indian reservations to avoid regulatory oversight completely. The payday loan model remains: Hide the true cost of borrowing. Don't share pricing up-front, making it difficult to compare. Keep people in debt forever, by making it "cheaper" to extend, rather than pay off the loan. But rather than trying to write new rules, which payday lenders will find their way around, we should consider unleashing the power of the market. Imagine if payday lenders had to share all of their pricing model with price comparison websites. Consumers who need cash could go to a single website and see how much it would actually cost to borrow the money until the loan is completely paid off. Remember the most important part of a price comparison website: the person with the lowest price almost always wins. Financial services are a commodity. So, if payday lender A has a 1,000 percent APR, and lender B has a 990 percent APR, then all of the business would shift to lender B. Lender A would see a dramatic drop in business, and would have to respond. Payday lenders could drop their prices by 90 percent and still make great profits. But they don't drop their prices because they don't have to. Forcing transparency on the payday lending market could drive real change. Consumers Would Benefit on Other Products The ability of the price comparison business model to transform financial services inspired me to leave the U.K. and move back to the U.S., where I created MagnifyMoney.com. I believe that complete price transparency quickly rewards companies with the best product, rather than the biggest marketing budget. For example, we have a balance transfer marketplace where PenFed (a credit union that anyone can join) usually takes the top spot. It is there because it has the best product (you can move your debt from other credit cards to PenFed and pay only 4.99 percent for 48 months, with no fee), not because it has the biggest marketing budget. When banks that are too big to fail aren't forced to compete based upon price, consumers lose. We have a lot to learn from the dominance of easy-to-use price comparison websites in the U.K., and I look forward to the day when banks, payday lenders and insurers are racing to drop prices in an effort to survive.

Managed to get that raise or promotion? Fantastic -- now don't go out there and spend it all immediately. In classic "keeping up with the Joneses" fashion, too many of us see an increase in salary or a sudden windfall (like an inheritance) as an excuse to take our lifestyle up a notch. We buy bigger houses than we need, get the latest gadgets even though ours work just fine,and spring for fancy steak dinners just because we can.